EPA Proposes Five Changes to Atrazine Labels, Introduces “Picklist” Mitigation

NCGA sees the new labeling requirements as a way to “impose arduous new restrictions and mitigation measures on the herbicide, limiting how much of the product farmers use.”

NCGA sees the new labeling requirements as a way to “impose arduous new restrictions and mitigation measures on the herbicide, limiting how much of the product farmers use.”
NCGA sees the new labeling requirements as a way to “impose arduous new restrictions and mitigation measures on the herbicide, limiting how much of the product farmers use.”
(Farm Journal)

On June 30, EPA released proposed revisions to the Agency’s September 2020 atrazine interim decision.

The agency is proposing the following five changes to the atrazine herbicide labels in order to decrease atrazine runoff from treated fields:

  • Prohibit application when soils are saturated or above field capacity (i.e., the soil’s ability to retain water); Prohibit application during rain or when a storm event, likely to produce runoff from the treated area, is forecasted to occur within 48 hours following application;
  • Prohibit aerial applications of all formulations; and
  • Restrict annual application rates to 2 pounds of active ingredient or less per acre per year or less for applications to sorghum, field corn, and sweet corn.
  • An additional “picklist” to labels requiring growers to select a combination of application rate reductions and/or runoff control measures when using atrazine in certain watersheds

The picklist method is said to help growers select runoff control practices that are the least burdensome.

The watersheds where growers must adhere to the picklist requirements are those watersheds with atrazine concentrations that exceed the CE-LOC of 3.4 μg/L–the EPA says this is approximately 18% of total watersheds nationwide. The number of mitigation practices required increases with the higher predicted atrazine concentration and depends on crop, geographic region and field topography. It does not apply to fields in watersheds with atrazine concentrations below 3.4 μg/L.

The National Corn Growers Association posted a quick response to the agency’s update.

“We are disappointed by EPA’s decision,” said Iowa farmer and National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) President Chris Edgington. “We can feed and fuel the world and fight climate change, but we can’t do these things without modern farming tools, and atrazine is a tool that is critical to our work.”

Edgington shared more on AgriTalk:

NCGA sees the new labeling requirements as a way to “impose arduous new restrictions and mitigation measures on the herbicide, limiting how much of the product farmers use.”

The association also stated this is a “step backward in EPA’s commitment to transparency and the use of the best available science.”

The 60-day public comment period is now open for the Proposed Revisions to the Atrazine Interim Registration Review Decision.

Scoop-logo (1346x354)
Read Next
ARA’s Hunter Carpenter breaks down the House-passed Farm Bill—and the critical pesticide labeling and permit reforms that got left behind. From the breakthrough on year-round E15 sales to the high-stakes battle over rail mergers, find out how these decisions impact your bottom line and license to operate.
Follow the Scoop
Get Daily News
Get Markets Alerts
Get News & Markets App