Xtendimax, Engenia and FeXapan Sales and Application “Paused”

In reaction to the ruling and its subsequent mandate, statements from associations and retail outlets detailed that effective immediately, none of the three products would be used, sold or distributed.

In reaction to the ruling and its subsequent mandate, statements from associations and retail outlets detailed that effective immediately, none of the three products would be used, sold or distributed.
In reaction to the ruling and its subsequent mandate, statements from associations and retail outlets detailed that effective immediately, none of the three products would be used, sold or distributed.
(Margy Eckelkamp)

As the sun rose on June 4, 2020 and the dust began to settle, dicamba sales were officially put on pause.

This was the day after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth District gave its afterhours ruling that made the active EPA labels for Xtendimax, Engenia and FeXapan invalid. And this court decision came right in the middle of application season for the products.

The Agricultural Retailers Association shared with members, “we would advise ceasing applications of Xtendimax, Engenia and Fexapan until advised by the registrants that it is legal to do so.”

In reaction to the ruling and its subsequent mandate, statements from state associations and retail outlets detailed that immediately, none of the three products would be used, sold or distributed.

Many are using the word “pause” to describe the halt in use and sales. The use and sale of the three products may resume if an appeal suspends the court decision, or it’s vacated by a higher court or reversed.

This is while the industry waits for EPA to share its guidance. On Friday morning, ARA sent a letter to EPA’s administrator Andrew Wheeler stating: “On behalf of our retailer and distributor members, the Agricultural Retailers Association (ARA) strongly urges the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to immediately appeal this federal court ruling using all legal avenues available to obtain a Stay of this overreaching court order and to apply longstanding “existing stocks” procedures to the cancellation.”

Right now, retailers are focusing on offering their agronomic resources to help growers find alternatives for this growing season. Some have already outlined plans for refunds on products.

Syngenta’s Tavium is not included in this ruling. In a statement the company provided it advised: “Syngenta continues to fulfill orders for Tavium.”

Here’s a selection of statements from ag retailers:

Related Articles
BREAKING: Court Removes Three Out of Four Dicamba Registrations

Non-Dicamba Options for Dicamba-Tolerant Soybeans

Scoop-logo (1346x354)
Read Next
ARA’s Hunter Carpenter breaks down the House-passed Farm Bill—and the critical pesticide labeling and permit reforms that got left behind. From the breakthrough on year-round E15 sales to the high-stakes battle over rail mergers, find out how these decisions impact your bottom line and license to operate.
Follow the Scoop
Get Daily News
Get Markets Alerts
Get News & Markets App